Search for: "In re: Paul Hansmeier"
Results 1 - 20
of 21
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 May 2013, 8:50 am
Together with John Steele, Paul Hansmeier and Paul Duffy, attorneys at Prenda Law (formerly known, among other things, as Steele Hansmeier, PLLC), he made life fairly miserable for thousands of potential defendants. [read post]
20 Oct 2013, 8:45 pm
Prenda, John Steele, Paul Hansmeier, Paul Duffy, and Mark Lutz have been suffering devastating blows across the country. [read post]
24 Nov 2015, 9:21 am
Minneapolis attorney Paul Hansmeier, who is most known to this blog for being associated with the Prenda Law 'trolling' saga, is facing suspension or disbarment. [read post]
20 May 2013, 9:39 am
See In re Hansmeier, No. 13-80114. [read post]
1 Sep 2011, 6:32 am
Paul Bergrin* Paul Bergrin wants to represent himself in his racketeering case. [read post]
20 Aug 2015, 5:59 am
[Wall Street Journal (sub. req.)] * This judge didn't play "just the tip" when it came to piercing his corporate veil: Paul Hansmeier of copyright-troll firm Prenda Law must pay sanctions to the tune of $64,000 after he drained cash from another one of his firms and then dissolved it. [read post]
22 Oct 2013, 1:07 pm
Paul Godfried, an attorney who has opposed Prenda and then was actually sued by the firm for defamation, wants to file the spreadsheets as evidence in a Minnesota court where a federal judge has re-opened several Prenda cases. [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 2:50 pm
Steele and his former partner Paul Hansmeier "submitted incomplete, and to say the least suspicious, statements of financial condition," wrote Herndon. [read post]
6 Mar 2013, 10:13 pm
AF Holdings designated Paul Hansmeier to answer questions. [read post]
11 Mar 2013, 7:35 pm
Lawyers Steele, Paul Hansmeier, Paul Duffy, and Prenda paralegal Angela Van Den Hemel had filed a notice on Friday saying that travel to the Central District Court of California was impossible for the out-of-state parties. [read post]
10 Apr 2013, 9:13 am
I previously described a quite good brief from attorneys for Prenda Law, Paul Duffy, and Angela Van Den Hemel, and a brief by attorneys for Paul Hansmeier. [read post]
20 Aug 2015, 4:18 am
US District Judge Otis Wright had Prenda's practices referred to the Internal Revenue Service's criminal investigation unit and in August 2014, the US Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit upheld judicial sanctions against Duffy and fellow attorneys John Steele, and Paul Hansmeier for engaging in “abusive litigation” and failing to pay attorney's fees to defendant Anthony Smith in a porn-downloading lawsuit. [read post]
4 May 2015, 12:38 pm
On appeal, Team Prenda argues that Judge Wright's sanctions and attorney fees award exceeded his power because (1) Team Prenda's inviduals — like John Steele and Paul Hansmeier — were not properly before the court, and (2) Judge Wright effectively levied criminal sanctions, triggering procedural rights that he did not extend to Team Prenda. [read post]
6 May 2015, 4:27 am
"They're prepared to run that gauntlet? [read post]
23 Apr 2013, 8:47 pm
Judge Chen noted: [I]t is telling that AF moved for a voluntary dismissal only two days after its 30(b)(6) deposition was taken, [that's referring to the ridiculous deposition of Paul Hansmeier as the representative of AF Holdings] during which problems related to its standing were explored and exposed by Mr. [read post]
5 May 2017, 7:43 am
Paul Hansmeier was charged as a co-defendant in the indictment and the plea agreement claims that he was also responsible for the aforementioned activities. [read post]
1 May 2013, 12:43 pm
Judge Chen noted: [I]t is telling that AF moved for a voluntary dismissal only two days after its 30(b)(6) deposition was taken, [that's referring to the ridiculous deposition of Paul Hansmeier as the representative of AF Holdings] during which problems related to its standing were explored and exposed by Mr. [read post]
23 Apr 2013, 8:47 pm
Judge Chen noted: [I]t is telling that AF moved for a voluntary dismissal only two days after its 30(b)(6) deposition was taken, [that's referring to the ridiculous deposition of Paul Hansmeier as the representative of AF Holdings] during which problems related to its standing were explored and exposed by Mr. [read post]
27 Dec 2014, 2:19 am
So, blocking orders: fine so long as they're reasonable! [read post]
26 Dec 2016, 4:30 am
If they think animals should have the right of copyright they're free, I think, under the Constitution, to do that. [read post]
